Quality fencing represents the foundation of successful sheep farming across Australia’s diverse landscapes and challenging conditions. From the predator-rich environments of southeastern forests to the vast open plains of the wheat belt, choosing appropriate fencing determines the difference between profitable operations and costly livestock losses.
Australian sheep farmers face unique challenges that demand robust fencing solutions. Wild dogs and foxes pose constant predation threats, whilst dingoes in northern regions can devastate unprotected flocks. Sheep naturally test boundaries through their grazing behaviour, requiring fencing that contains without causing injury. Additionally, our extreme weather conditions from cyclones to bushfires place exceptional demands on fencing infrastructure.
The investment in proper sheep fencing pays dividends through reduced stock losses, improved grazing management, and enhanced biosecurity. Modern fencing options offer solutions for every budget and application, from temporary electric systems for rotational grazing to permanent installations that provide decades of reliable service.
Understanding the costs, benefits, and applications of different fencing types allows informed decisions that match your specific circumstances. Whether establishing new paddocks, upgrading existing infrastructure, or addressing specific challenges like predator pressure, selecting appropriate fencing ensures your sheep remain secure whilst supporting efficient farm management practices.

Common Sheep Fencing Challenges in Australian Conditions
Predator Pressure Across Regional Zones
Wild Dog and Dingo Threats
Wild dogs represent the most significant predation risk for Australian sheep operations. These intelligent predators work in packs, can clear standard sheep fencing with ease, and cause devastating losses when they breach perimeter defences. Their distribution across most of Australia means few sheep farmers can ignore this threat.
Dingoes in northern Australia present similar challenges but with greater jumping ability and pack coordination. Standard agricultural fencing proves inadequate against these apex predators, requiring specialised exclusion fencing or alternative management strategies.
Fox Predation Management
European foxes target lambs and smaller sheep, using their digging ability to breach fencing through underground routes. Their widespread distribution across southern Australia makes fox-proofing essential for successful lamb production. Conventional fencing must incorporate ground-level barriers to prevent excavation access.
Sheep Behaviour and Containment Issues
Natural Grazing Patterns
Sheep naturally push boundaries whilst grazing, testing fence integrity through constant pressure against wires and posts. Their flocking behaviour means when one sheep finds a breach, the entire mob quickly follows. This behaviour requires fencing that maintains strength under continuous pressure whilst providing clear visual barriers.
Wool Entanglement Risks
Traditional barbed wire fencing creates significant wool loss and injury risks. Sheep regularly catch their fleece on barbs, resulting in torn wool, skin damage, and occasional entrapment. Modern sheep fencing prioritises smooth surfaces that allow safe contact whilst maintaining containment effectiveness.
Environmental Stress Factors
During extreme weather events, sheep naturally seek shelter and may break through inadequate fencing. Bushfire threats require fencing that allows rapid evacuation whilst containing stock during normal conditions. Flood-prone areas need fencing that withstands water pressure and debris impact.
Infrastructure Durability Requirements
Extreme Weather Resistance
Australian conditions test fencing materials through temperature extremes, UV exposure, and severe weather events. Metal components must resist corrosion in coastal areas whilst timber posts require termite and rot resistance in humid climates. Expansion and contraction cycles stress joints and connections, demanding robust construction methods.
Maintenance Access Challenges
Remote paddock locations often limit regular maintenance access, requiring fencing systems that operate reliably with minimal intervention. Self-maintaining systems like electric fencing appeal to operations where regular inspection proves difficult or expensive.
Traditional Wire and Post Fencing Systems
Plain Wire Configuration
Standard Seven-Wire Setup
Traditional sheep fencing typically employs seven horizontal wires stretched between timber or steel posts. Wire spacing varies from 100mm at ground level to 200mm between upper wires, providing containment whilst preventing leg injuries. This configuration balances material costs with functionality across most applications.
High-tensile plain wire offers superior strength and longevity compared to mild steel alternatives. The increased tension capability reduces post requirements whilst maintaining fence integrity under livestock pressure. However, installation requires specialised tensioning equipment and proper technique to achieve optimal results.
Enhanced Nine-Wire Systems
Operations facing higher predator pressure or managing valuable breeding stock often specify nine-wire configurations. Additional wires at ground level and mid-height improve containment whilst creating more formidable barriers for predators. The increased material costs often prove justified through reduced stock losses.
Post Material Considerations
Timber Post Applications
| Post Type | Lifespan | Cost per Post | Best Applications |
| Treated pine | 15-20 years | $12-18 | Standard applications, good soil |
| Ironbark | 25-30 years | $25-35 | Heavy-duty, challenging conditions |
| Steel star pickets | 20-25 years | $8-15 | Rocky soils, temporary installations |
| Concrete posts | 30+ years | $18-25 | Permanent installations, wet conditions |
Steel Post Systems
Steel star pickets provide economical solutions for many applications, particularly in rocky soils where driving posts proves easier than digging holes. Their consistent dimensions ensure accurate wire spacing whilst galvanised coatings provide corrosion resistance. However, steel posts conduct electricity, limiting use with electric fencing systems.
Installation and Tensioning
Proper Tensioning Techniques
High-tensile wire requires approximately 250kg of tension for optimal performance. Over-tensioning causes wire breaks during thermal expansion, whilst under-tensioning allows sagging that compromises containment. Inline tensioners allow periodic adjustments to maintain optimal wire tension throughout the fence’s lifespan.
Corner and Gateway Construction
Corner assemblies bear enormous loads from tensioned wires and require substantial construction. Properly braced corners using H-frame or diagonal brace designs distribute loads effectively, preventing post movement that compromises the entire fence line. Gateway installations need similar attention to structural integrity.
Cost Analysis for Wire Fencing
| Component | Cost per 100m | Installation Labour | Annual Maintenance |
| Seven-wire plain | $180-250 | $120-180 | $15-25 |
| Nine-wire enhanced | $220-300 | $140-200 | $20-30 |
| High-tensile upgrade | $200-280 | $100-150 | $10-20 |
Electric Fencing Solutions
Single-Wire Electric Systems
Temporary Grazing Management
Single-wire electric fencing excels for rotational grazing applications where frequent fence movement is required. Modern energisers provide reliable power whilst portable posts allow rapid installation and relocation. This flexibility makes electric fencing ideal for intensive grazing management systems.
Battery-powered energisers suit remote applications where mains power proves unavailable. Solar-powered units offer sustainable operation in sunny Australian conditions, though backup battery systems ensure operation during cloudy periods. Proper earthing systems remain critical for effective operation in dry Australian soils.
Permanent Electric Installations
Multi-wire permanent electric fencing provides excellent containment with lower material costs than traditional systems. Three to five electrified wires typically contain sheep effectively whilst allowing easy stock movement. The psychological barrier effect means sheep quickly learn to avoid the fence, reducing physical pressure on the system.
Electric Netting Systems
Portable Electric Netting
Electric netting combines physical barriers with electric deterrence, creating effective temporary fencing for small areas. The close wire spacing prevents sheep from pushing through whilst electric wires deter contact attempts. This system works particularly well for containing sheep in specific grazing areas or around sensitive crops.
Modern electric netting uses lightweight materials and integrated posts for rapid deployment. A single person can install several hundred metres quickly, making it ideal for frequent moves in intensive grazing systems. However, the initial cost per metre exceeds traditional fencing options.
Permanent Electric Mesh
Fixed electric mesh installations provide long-term containment with excellent predator deterrence. The multi-level electric wires create barriers for climbing predators whilst the close mesh spacing prevents entry by smaller threats. This system suits valuable breeding flocks or areas with high predation pressure.
Power Supply and Earthing Systems
Energiser Selection Guidelines
| Fence Length | Stock Numbers | Recommended Energiser Output | Power Source Options |
| Up to 5km | Small flocks (<100) | 5-8 joules | Battery, solar, mains |
| 5-15km | Medium flocks (100-300) | 8-15 joules | Solar, mains preferred |
| 15km+ | Large operations (300+) | 15+ joules | Mains power recommended |
Earthing System Requirements
Australian soils often present earthing challenges due to low moisture content and high mineral levels. Effective electric fencing requires multiple earth stakes connected with heavy-gauge wire to create adequate earth return paths. Clay soils generally provide better earthing than sandy soils, requiring adjustment in earth stake numbers.
Electric Fencing Cost Analysis
| System Type | Installation Cost per 100m | Annual Operating Cost | Maintenance Requirements |
| Single-wire temporary | $45-65 | $25-35 | Low, regular checking |
| Multi-wire permanent | $85-120 | $40-60 | Moderate, vegetation control |
| Electric netting | $250-350 | $60-80 | High, frequent handling |
Netting and Mesh Fencing Options
Sheep Mesh (Ringlock) Fencing
Standard Ringlock Configuration
Sheep mesh fencing uses horizontal wires connected by vertical stays to create a physical barrier that prevents sheep from pushing through. The graduated spacing from 75mm at the base to 300mm at the top accommodates sheep anatomy whilst preventing escape attempts. This system provides excellent stock containment with minimal maintenance requirements.
Quality ringlock mesh uses high-tensile wire throughout, providing superior strength compared to mild steel alternatives. The knot construction method significantly affects durability, with fixed knots providing better wire retention under stress than hinge joints. Premium mesh justifies higher initial costs through extended service life.
Heavy-Duty Predator Mesh
Enhanced mesh systems incorporate closer wire spacing and heavier gauge construction to deter predator penetration. Additional bottom wires at 50mm spacing prevent fox entry whilst reinforced top sections resist wild dog climbing attempts. These systems command premium prices but provide superior protection for valuable breeding stock.
Chicken Wire and Light Mesh Applications
Temporary Containment Solutions
Lightweight chicken wire provides economical solutions for temporary containment or specific applications like lamb-proofing areas. The fine mesh prevents small animals from escaping whilst allowing visual contact that reduces stress. However, the light construction limits durability and predator resistance.
Installation of light mesh requires careful handling to prevent damage during setup. The mesh must be stretched evenly and secured properly to prevent sagging that compromises effectiveness. Regular inspection identifies damage early, preventing costly stock losses.
Woven Wire Combinations
Horse Mesh Adaptations
Woven horse mesh offers superior visibility and strength compared to standard sheep mesh, though at increased cost. The rectangular spacing pattern provides excellent containment whilst reducing wool catching compared to barbed alternatives. This system suits operations where stock visibility and handler safety are priorities.
Specialty Mesh Applications
| Mesh Type | Wire Spacing | Cost per 100m | Best Applications |
| Standard ringlock | 75-300mm graduated | $180-250 | General sheep containment |
| Heavy-duty mesh | 50-250mm graduated | $220-300 | High-value flocks, predator areas |
| Horse mesh | 100x200mm rectangular | $250-350 | Visibility required, handler safety |
| Chicken wire | 25mm hexagonal | $80-120 | Temporary use, lamb areas |
Combination Fencing Systems
Electric and Physical Barrier Integration
Traditional Fence Enhancement
Adding electric wires to existing traditional fencing dramatically improves containment effectiveness whilst deterring predators. A single electric wire positioned 150mm inside the fence line prevents sheep from leaning against the physical barrier, extending fence life significantly. This upgrade proves particularly cost-effective for existing installations.
Offset electric wires positioned outside the fence create psychological barriers for predators whilst maintaining the physical containment properties of the base fence. Wild dogs encountering electric shocks typically avoid the area entirely, providing enhanced protection without complete fence replacement.
Multi-Level Protection Systems Advanced combination systems integrate multiple electric wires with physical barriers to create comprehensive containment and protection. These systems typically include:
- Ground-level electric wire for fox deterrence
- Mid-level physical barrier for sheep containment
- Top-level electric wire for wild dog deterrence
- Apron wire buried to prevent digging access
Temporary and Permanent Hybrid Systems
Seasonal Flexibility
Combination systems allow adaptation to seasonal requirements without complete fence replacement. Summer installations might emphasise stock containment, whilst winter modifications add predator deterrence during vulnerable lambing periods. This flexibility maximises fencing investment returns across varying operational requirements.
Portable electric components can enhance permanent physical fencing when temporary higher security is needed. During drought periods when natural feed is scarce and predator pressure increases, temporary electric additions provide extra protection until conditions improve.
Zone-Specific Design Applications
Perimeter versus Internal Fencing
Property perimeters require maximum security against both stock escape and predator entry, justifying investment in premium combination systems. Internal paddock divisions can utilise simpler systems focused primarily on stock containment and grazing management.
High-Risk Area Protection
| Risk Level | Recommended System | Cost Premium | Expected Protection Level |
| Low risk | Standard physical barrier | Baseline | 85-90% containment |
| Moderate risk | Physical + single electric | 30-40% increase | 95-98% containment |
| High risk | Multi-wire electric + physical | 60-80% increase | 98-99%+ containment |
| Extreme risk | Exclusion fencing systems | 200-300% increase | 99%+ comprehensive protection |
Comprehensive Cost Analysis per Metre
Material Cost Breakdown
Traditional Wire Fencing Costs (per metre)
| System Configuration | Materials | Installation Labour | Total Cost | Expected Lifespan |
| Five-wire basic | $1.20-1.80 | $0.80-1.20 | $2.00-3.00 | 15-20 years |
| Seven-wire standard | $1.80-2.50 | $1.20-1.80 | $3.00-4.30 | 20-25 years |
| Nine-wire enhanced | $2.20-3.00 | $1.40-2.00 | $3.60-5.00 | 20-25 years |
| High-tensile upgrade | $2.00-2.80 | $1.00-1.50 | $3.00-4.30 | 25-30 years |
Electric Fencing System Costs (per metre)
| System Type | Equipment Cost | Installation | Power Supply | Annual Operating |
| Single-wire temporary | $0.45-0.65 | $0.20-0.35 | $0.15-0.25 | $0.25-0.35 |
| Multi-wire permanent | $0.85-1.20 | $0.40-0.60 | $0.25-0.40 | $0.40-0.60 |
| Electric netting | $2.50-3.50 | $0.80-1.20 | $0.35-0.50 | $0.60-0.80 |
Mesh and Netting System Costs (per metre)
| Mesh Configuration | Material Cost | Installation Cost | Total Investment | Maintenance Annual |
| Standard ringlock | $1.80-2.50 | $1.00-1.50 | $2.80-4.00 | $0.15-0.25 |
| Heavy-duty mesh | $2.20-3.00 | $1.20-1.80 | $3.40-4.80 | $0.20-0.30 |
| Horse mesh adaptation | $2.50-3.50 | $1.30-2.00 | $3.80-5.50 | $0.25-0.35 |
Long-Term Investment Analysis
Cost Per Year of Service
| Fencing Type | Initial Cost | Lifespan | Annual Cost | Maintenance Factor |
| Basic wire (5-wire) | $2.00-3.00 | 15 years | $0.13-0.20 | Low |
| Standard wire (7-wire) | $3.00-4.30 | 22 years | $0.14-0.20 | Low |
| Enhanced wire (9-wire) | $3.60-5.00 | 22 years | $0.16-0.23 | Low |
| Electric permanent | $1.50-2.20 | 18 years | $0.08-0.12 | Moderate |
| Standard mesh | $2.80-4.00 | 25 years | $0.11-0.16 | Low |
| Heavy-duty mesh | $3.40-4.80 | 30 years | $0.11-0.16 | Very low |
Regional Cost Variations
Transport and Access Factors
Remote locations face significant cost premiums due to material transport and reduced contractor availability. Transport costs can add 20-50% to material costs in isolated areas, whilst labour rates often increase due to travel time and accommodation requirements.
Urban fringe properties benefit from competitive contractor availability but may face restrictions on fencing types and heights due to planning regulations. These areas often require specialist consultation to ensure compliance with local requirements.
Predator-Proofing Strategies
Fox Exclusion Techniques
Ground-Level Protection Systems
Foxes utilise their exceptional digging ability to breach standard fencing through underground routes. Effective fox-proofing requires apron wire extending 300-500mm horizontally from the fence base, buried 100-150mm deep. This underground barrier redirects digging attempts away from the fence line.
Alternative approaches include concrete footings or buried mesh extensions that create impenetrable underground barriers. These methods prove more expensive initially but provide permanent protection that requires no ongoing maintenance. The investment often justifies itself in areas with persistent fox pressure.
Electric Wire Integration
Low-voltage electric wires positioned 100-150mm above ground level create psychological barriers that deter fox approaches. These systems work particularly effectively when combined with physical barriers, creating multiple deterrence levels that discourage investigation attempts.
Wild Dog and Dingo Deterrence
Height and Overhang Requirements
Wild dogs can clear 1.8m fencing with ease, requiring enhanced height or overhang systems for effective exclusion. Minimum fence heights of 2.4m with 45-degree outward overhangs provide reliable containment against most wild dog incursions. These requirements significantly increase fencing costs but prove essential in high-risk areas.
Exclusion Fencing Specifications
| Component | Standard Requirement | Enhanced Security | Extreme Risk Areas |
| Fence height | 1.8m minimum | 2.4m minimum | 2.4m + overhang |
| Wire spacing | 150mm maximum | 100mm maximum | 75mm maximum |
| Ground clearance | 50mm maximum | 25mm maximum | Underground barrier |
| Post spacing | 8m maximum | 6m maximum | 4m maximum |
Maintenance and Monitoring
Predator-proof fencing requires regular inspection to identify potential breach points before they compromise security. Vegetation growth can create climbing aids for predators, requiring ongoing management along fence lines. Gates and boundary connections represent common failure points that need particular attention.
Integrated Predator Management
Zone-Based Protection Systems
Large properties often employ zone-based protection strategies that concentrate the most vulnerable stock in highly protected areas whilst using standard containment for general grazing areas. This approach optimises protection investment whilst maintaining operational flexibility.
Breeding paddocks and lambing areas receive maximum protection through combination fencing systems, whilst general grazing areas utilise standard containment with periodic electric enhancement during high-risk periods.
Maintenance Requirements and Lifespan Expectations
Routine Maintenance Protocols
Inspection Schedules
Regular fence inspection prevents minor issues from becoming major failures. Monthly visual inspections identify obvious damage, whilst quarterly detailed inspections examine post condition, wire tension, and connection integrity. Annual comprehensive assessments guide maintenance planning and budget allocation.
Seasonal Maintenance Tasks
| Season | Priority Tasks | Time Investment | Cost Implications |
| Autumn | Post assessment, wire tensioning | 2-4 hours/km | Low, preventive |
| Winter | Vegetation control, drainage clearing | 3-5 hours/km | Moderate |
| Spring | Damage assessment, replacement planning | 4-6 hours/km | Variable |
| Summer | Emergency repairs, heat damage check | 2-3 hours/km | Low to high |
Material Degradation Factors
Environmental Stress Analysis
Australian conditions accelerate fencing degradation through multiple pathways. UV radiation breaks down polymer components in electric fencing, whilst thermal cycling stresses metal connections. Salt air in coastal areas accelerates corrosion, particularly affecting untreated steel components.
Bushfire exposure can completely destroy fencing infrastructure, requiring comprehensive replacement. Fire-resistant materials like steel posts and high-tensile wire offer better survival chances than timber and plastic alternatives.
Preventive Maintenance Strategies
Proactive maintenance significantly extends fencing lifespan whilst reducing long-term costs. Regular tensioning prevents wire stretching that leads to sagging and eventual failure. Post straightening and reinforcement address minor movement before structural failure occurs.
Vegetation management around fence lines reduces fire risk whilst preventing damage from falling branches. Chemical vegetation control often proves more cost-effective than mechanical methods, particularly in rough terrain where machinery access is difficult.
Replacement Planning and Budgeting
Lifespan Expectations by Material
| Material Type | Average Lifespan | Replacement Indicators | Planning Timeline |
| Treated pine posts | 15-20 years | Softening, lean, splitting | Plan replacement 2-3 years ahead |
| Steel posts | 20-25 years | Rust, bending, loosening | Monitor annually, plan 5 years ahead |
| High-tensile wire | 25-30 years | Corrosion, breaks, stretching | Plan replacement in sections |
| Electric components | 10-15 years | Power loss, insulator failure | Budget annual component replacement |
Budgeting for Ongoing Costs
Successful fencing management requires budgeting for both routine maintenance and eventual replacement. Annual maintenance typically costs 1-3% of the original installation cost, whilst replacement reserves should accumulate at 3-5% annually to ensure adequate funds when replacement becomes necessary.
Optimal Fencing for Different Flock Sizes
Small Flock Operations (Under 100 Head)
Cost-Effective Solutions
Small flock operations require balance between protection effectiveness and economic viability. Electric fencing often provides the best cost-to-benefit ratio for smaller areas, offering flexibility for grazing management whilst maintaining reasonable initial investment.
Multi-wire electric systems with battery or solar power supply can protect flocks effectively whilst allowing system expansion as operations grow. The modular nature of electric fencing permits gradual installation that spreads costs over multiple seasons.
Recommended System Specifications
| Application | Recommended System | Cost per 100m | Key Benefits |
| General containment | 3-wire electric | $85-120 | Low cost, flexible, expandable |
| Predator protection | Electric netting | $250-350 | Complete protection, portable |
| Permanent paddocks | 5-wire plain | $200-300 | Reliable, low maintenance |
Medium Flock Operations (100-500 Head)
Balanced Investment Strategies
Medium-sized operations benefit from mixed fencing approaches that optimise protection levels across different farm zones. High-value areas like breeding paddocks justify premium fencing investment, whilst general grazing areas can utilise more economical solutions.
Permanent perimeter fencing using traditional wire systems provides long-term containment, whilst internal paddock divisions can employ electric systems for grazing management flexibility. This hybrid approach maximises functionality whilst controlling costs.
Infrastructure Planning
Medium operations should plan fencing infrastructure systematically, establishing priority zones for immediate fencing whilst creating long-term plans for complete property development. This staged approach allows cash flow management whilst building towards comprehensive fencing coverage.
Large Commercial Operations (500+ Head)
Professional Installation Requirements
Large-scale operations typically justify professional installation due to the scale of investment and precision required for optimal performance. Contractor installation ensures consistent quality whilst allowing farm management to focus on operational priorities.
Bulk material purchasing provides significant cost savings on large projects, whilst standardised specifications throughout the property simplify maintenance and replacement procedures. Professional design consultation optimises fencing layout for both containment effectiveness and operational efficiency.
Long-Term Asset Management
| Fencing Zone | Investment Level | Expected ROI | Replacement Cycle |
| Perimeter boundary | Premium systems | 15-20 years | 25-30 years |
| Breeding paddocks | Enhanced protection | 10-15 years | 20-25 years |
| General paddocks | Standard systems | 8-12 years | 18-22 years |
| Temporary divisions | Electric systems | 5-8 years | 12-15 years |
Technology Integration
Large operations increasingly integrate monitoring technology with fencing systems to provide early warning of breaches or system failures. Remote monitoring systems alert management to fence failures, reducing stock loss risks and maintenance response times.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Recommendations
Return on Investment Calculations
Stock Loss Prevention Value
Quality fencing pays for itself through reduced stock losses alone. A properly fenced property with minimal predator breaches typically experiences stock losses below 2% annually, whilst poorly fenced operations may lose 5-15% of their flock. On a 500-head operation with $200 average stock value, this difference represents $3,000-26,000 annually.
Grazing Management Benefits
Effective internal fencing enables rotational grazing systems that improve pasture productivity by 20-30%. This productivity increase often justifies fencing investment through improved carrying capacity and reduced supplementary feeding requirements.
Operational Efficiency Gains
| Benefit Category | Annual Value | Fencing Investment Payback |
| Stock loss prevention | $2,000-15,000 | 2-5 years |
| Improved pasture management | $1,500-8,000 | 3-8 years |
| Reduced labour requirements | $500-2,000 | 5-15 years |
| Enhanced biosecurity | $500-3,000 | Variable |
System Selection Guidelines
Decision Matrix for Fencing Choice
| Priority Factor | Wire Systems | Electric Systems | Mesh Systems | Combination Systems |
| Initial cost | Good | Excellent | Fair | Fair |
| Predator protection | Fair | Good | Good | Excellent |
| Stock containment | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| Maintenance requirements | Good | Fair | Excellent | Fair |
| Flexibility | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Good |
| Longevity | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
Climate and Location Factors
High-rainfall areas favour wire and mesh systems that resist vegetation interference, whilst arid regions suit electric systems that perform reliably in dry conditions. Coastal locations require corrosion-resistant materials, adding premiums to steel-based systems.
Remote locations with limited maintenance access benefit from low-maintenance wire and mesh systems, whilst properties with regular management attention can utilise electric systems effectively.
Successful sheep fencing in Australia requires matching system selection to specific operational requirements, risk factors, and budget constraints. The initial investment in appropriate fencing pays dividends through reduced stock losses, improved grazing management, and enhanced operational efficiency.
Quality fencing represents infrastructure investment that supports profitable sheep farming for decades when properly selected and maintained. The key lies in understanding your specific requirements and choosing systems that deliver appropriate protection levels without unnecessary cost premiums.
Whether protecting small hobby flocks or managing large commercial operations, the principles remain consistent: invest in perimeter security, match internal fencing to operational needs, and maintain systems proactively to maximise service life. These fundamentals ensure your fencing investment supports profitable sheep farming across Australia’s challenging conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
The best fencing depends on flock size, property layout, and predator pressure. In many parts of Australia, a combination of netting or hinge-joint wire with an electric offset wire is the most effective and cost-efficient solution.
Traditional wire and post fencing usually costs $4–8 per metre, while electric fencing ranges from $2–5 per metre. Mesh or netting systems can reach $10–15 per metre depending on materials and terrain.
Sheep fencing should generally be at least 1.05–1.2 metres high. If predators such as wild dogs are a concern, higher fencing or additional electric wires may be required.
Yes. Electric fencing is widely used and effective, particularly when combined with a physical barrier like hinge-joint wire. Sheep need strong, consistent voltage because their wool can insulate them from light shocks.
Predator protection often involves mesh or hinge-joint wire with small gaps at the base, plus electric offsets. In areas with wild dogs or foxes, netting buried 20–30 cm underground or apron fencing helps prevent digging.
For small acreages, temporary electric netting or a two-wire electric system can be cost-effective. It offers flexibility and lower upfront costs, though it requires regular maintenance and monitoring.
Well-constructed fencing can last 15–25 years. Longevity depends on materials used, soil conditions, and maintenance. Galvanised steel posts and high-tensile wire usually provide the longest lifespan.


